An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

A forum to discuss Urban Terror
User avatar
Rayne
Site Admin
Posts: 624
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm

An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by Rayne »

I find this to be quite interesting, and personally would LOVE to see a resurrection of the old 2.6 game. The REAL UrT game, which had the potential to be the biggest competition to CS franchise before all the hopping around and stuff was added.
http://www.urbanterror.info/forums/topi ... ease-read/

User avatar
xandaxs
Posts: 959
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: Oeiras, Portugal

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by xandaxs »

no no no, don't take jumping from the game.
[12:25] <JohnnyEnglish> morning Nounou
[12:25] <JohnnyEnglish> wotcha doing?
[12:25] <Nounou> hello
[12:26] <Nounou> nothing much, i've nothing to do at work so
[12:26] <Nounou> modeling woman
[12:26] <JohnnyEnglish> woo
[12:26] <JohnnyEnglish> real women?
[12:26] <Nounou> realistic yes, on maya

Image

User avatar
Rayne
Site Admin
Posts: 624
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by Rayne »

yes yes yes, that dumb thing destroyed the original game. When walljumping was added, the game changed completely, it was no longer UrT and just like that guy said it turned into a Q3 with different weapons and different way of jumping around.
I would kill to see a new version of 2.6. It never crossed my mind to see if people can port 2.6 to a new engine instead of 4.1. I love the idea, i want it, i want it, i want it.

User avatar
xandaxs
Posts: 959
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: Oeiras, Portugal

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by xandaxs »

NOOOOOOOO!! Let me Jump! :(
[12:25] <JohnnyEnglish> morning Nounou
[12:25] <JohnnyEnglish> wotcha doing?
[12:25] <Nounou> hello
[12:26] <Nounou> nothing much, i've nothing to do at work so
[12:26] <Nounou> modeling woman
[12:26] <JohnnyEnglish> woo
[12:26] <JohnnyEnglish> real women?
[12:26] <Nounou> realistic yes, on maya

Image

User avatar
Rayne
Site Admin
Posts: 624
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by Rayne »

Man i don't care about 4.1, i want to see 2.6 back in active development. And if this guy get's it, he has my full support.

User avatar
xandaxs
Posts: 959
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm
Location: Oeiras, Portugal

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by xandaxs »

Nou :(
[12:25] <JohnnyEnglish> morning Nounou
[12:25] <JohnnyEnglish> wotcha doing?
[12:25] <Nounou> hello
[12:26] <Nounou> nothing much, i've nothing to do at work so
[12:26] <Nounou> modeling woman
[12:26] <JohnnyEnglish> woo
[12:26] <JohnnyEnglish> real women?
[12:26] <Nounou> realistic yes, on maya

Image

User avatar
Rayne
Site Admin
Posts: 624
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by Rayne »

UrT 2.6 on Overdose engine...instant orgasm.

User avatar
Delirium
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by Delirium »

Xan, I'm sorry but I have to agree, walljumping is fun.. but 2.3 was the _best_ version of UrT... PERIOD
Image

User avatar
Rayne
Site Admin
Posts: 624
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:22 pm

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by Rayne »

Slackin and I don't see eye to eye but if he can help this guy revive 2.6/2.3 and move the old school gameplay to a new engine i can see a very good competitor to CS 1.6 and would gladly pay for that game.

User avatar
Delirium
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: An interesting discussion on UrT.info site

Post by Delirium »

topic was removed?
Image

Post Reply